Oliver Page
Case study
September 24, 2025
As technology becomes more integrated into the classroom, student data is increasingly shifting from paper to digital formats. This evolution brings incredible opportunities for learning but also introduces new risks to student privacy. California's Student Online Personal Information Protection Act (SOPIPA), established through Senate Bill 1177, was the first comprehensive state law to address these challenges head-on.
This guide will help you understand What to Know About California's SB 1177 (SOPIPA Expansion) and Its Impact on K–12 Schools, explaining how this groundbreaking legislation protects student data and transforms how schools work with educational technology vendors.
Key Points About SB 1177 (SOPIPA):
For K-12 IT directors and administrators, SOPIPA represents both a shield and a responsibility. While the law protects students from data exploitation, it also requires schools to be more vigilant about vendor relationships and data management practices. The legislation sparked a national movement, with dozens of states introducing similar laws. Understanding SOPIPA is not just about compliance—it's about building a foundation for responsible educational technology use.
Enacted in 2014 and effective since January 1, 2016, the Student Online Personal Information Protection Act (SOPIPA) was California's pioneering response to the growing concerns over student data privacy in the digital age. Before SOPIPA, student data was often collected by EdTech companies with few restrictions, leaving it vulnerable to commercial use. Spearheaded by Senator Darrell Steinberg, SB 1177 was designed to fill this gap.
The law's influence has grown, with amendments like AB 2799 extending its protections to preschool and prekindergarten students, demonstrating a commitment to safeguarding student data from the earliest stages of education. You can review the original legislation in the official SB 1177 bill text.
SOPIPA’s core mission is to prevent the commercial exploitation of student data. It establishes clear boundaries for EdTech vendors, ensuring that student information is used for educational purposes only. The law empowers schools by giving them the legal leverage to demand robust privacy protections from their technology partners, creating a safer digital learning environment where students can focus on learning without their personal data becoming a commodity.
SOPIPA specifically targets the operators of websites, online services, or mobile applications that are designed and marketed for K-12 school purposes and are used primarily for those purposes. This focused approach means the law applies directly to the EdTech companies that are integral to the modern classroom, rather than general-audience platforms that students might use incidentally. For a deeper dive into the specifics, see our guide on All About SOPIPA: California's Law Protecting Student Data in the Digital Age.
SOPIPA establishes a clear set of rules for EdTech operators, outlining both what they cannot do with student data and what they must do to protect it. These rules give schools the power to hold vendors accountable.
SOPIPA draws several bright red lines to prevent the commercialization of student information:
Beyond prohibitions, SOPIPA imposes affirmative duties on vendors:
These requirements are critical for vetting vendors. For practical tips on managing vendor security, explore our advice on Beyond Firewalls: How to Secure Data Shared with Third-Party EdTech Vendors.
SOPIPA has fundamentally reshaped how schools approach technology, shifting the focus from just features and cost to include data privacy and security as primary concerns.
Gone are the days of adopting new educational apps without rigorous scrutiny. SOPIPA, along with companion laws like AB 1584, has made vendor vetting a critical part of the procurement process. AB 1584 requires contracts to specify that the school district owns and controls student data, mandating that vendors detail their security measures and prohibit them from using data for unauthorized purposes. This means every EdTech agreement is now a privacy agreement. Schools must demand strong contractual safeguards and understand the nuances of student records sharing regulations.
SOPIPA has also pushed schools to become more sophisticated in their own data management practices. This includes:
SOPIPA was not created in a vacuum. It complements existing federal laws and has inspired a new wave of state-level privacy legislation across the country.
The most important federal law concerning student privacy is the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). While both laws protect student information, they do so in different ways:
In short, FERPA sets the rules for schools, while SOPIPA sets the rules for their technology vendors. Together, they create a more comprehensive framework for protecting student privacy in the digital age.
SOPIPA's passage marked a turning point in student data privacy. It served as a model for the rest of the country, with over 30 states introducing or passing similar legislation. This national movement has raised the bar for EdTech companies, forcing them to prioritize privacy and security in their product design. California continues to lead in this area, with other laws like the What to Know About the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) for Schools adding further layers of protection that can also impact schools.
SOPIPA allows operators to use student data for specific, non-commercial purposes. These include improving the educational product, conducting legitimate research for educational purposes, ensuring legal or regulatory compliance, and responding to judicial processes. Data can also be used if it is de-identified or aggregated, meaning it cannot be linked back to an individual student.
Companies must ensure their products and data handling practices are fully compliant with SOPIPA. This includes building privacy-by-design into their services, being transparent with school districts about their data policies, and having robust security measures in place. Companies that demonstrate strong compliance can gain a competitive advantage, as schools are now required to prioritize vendors who take student privacy seriously.
SOPIPA itself does not specify penalties for non-compliance. However, this doesn't mean it lacks teeth. Enforcement typically happens through contractual obligations between schools and vendors. If a vendor violates SOPIPA, they are in breach of their contract with the school district. Additionally, violations could lead to civil action under other consumer protection laws. The primary enforcement mechanism, therefore, lies with school districts holding their vendors accountable.
California's SB 1177 (SOPIPA) has fundamentally reshaped the landscape of student data privacy, placing new responsibilities on both EdTech vendors and the schools that use their services. It's no longer enough to simply adopt new technology; districts must now be proactive stewards of their students' digital lives.
This means:
In the end, technology and policies are only part of the solution. The most significant threats often come from human error. That's why building a culture of cybersecurity awareness is the most effective defense. To understand your school's specific vulnerabilities, consider a professional phishing audit: https://www.cybernut.com/phishing-audit.
At CyberNut, we specialize in creating that culture through engaging, automated training designed for the unique needs of K-12 schools. To learn more about how we can help you protect your students and staff, explore our resources.
In 2014, California enacted SB 1177 to create the Student Online Personal Information Protection Act (SOPIPA), effective January 1, 2016. The law set clear, statewide rules to stop the commercial exploitation of student data by EdTech providers and to require reasonable security safeguards. California later expanded protections through AB 2799 to include preschool and prekindergarten programs, reinforcing privacy from the earliest years of learning.
You can read the complete text here: The official SB 1177 bill text.
SOPIPA sets clear limits on how operators can use student information and what protections they must implement.
For practical guidance:
SOPIPA reshaped purchasing and governance. Districts now approach EdTech like a privacy-first partnership.
SOPIPA complements federal law rather than replacing it. FERPA governs how schools handle education records, while SOPIPA governs how third-party operators handle student data in K-12 services.
Key distinctions without the legalese:
Together, FERPA + SOPIPA create a more complete privacy framework for modern classrooms.
California's SOPIPA directly targets EdTech vendors to stop targeted advertising, selling student data, and non-educational profiling, while requiring reasonable security and deletion on request. Effective since 2016 and strengthened over time, SOPIPA shifts districts toward privacy-first procurement and lifecycle data management.
If you're working in student data privacy, you'll also want to understand these related laws:
Signed on September 29, 2014 and effective January 1, 2016, SOPIPA was authored by Senator Darrell Steinberg to curb commercial misuse of student data and require security controls from K-12 operators. California extended these protections to younger learners with AB 2799.
You can read the complete legislation here: The official SB 1177 bill text.
SOPIPA draws lines around student data and assigns concrete security duties.
Resources:
SOPIPA accelerated a culture shift: districts now weigh privacy and security as heavily as cost and features.
SOPIPA complements FERPA by regulating third-party operators, while FERPA governs schools. In practice:
Result: A two-layer privacy model that better fits digital learning.
SOPIPA was the first comprehensive state law to protect K-12 student data from commercial misuse by EdTech operators. It bans targeted advertising and selling student data, requires reasonable security, and mandates deletion at a district's request. Since taking effect in 2016, it has influenced national best practices and spurred similar laws in many states.
Understanding student privacy laws is crucial for today's educational leaders. Explore: All About FERPA: The Federal Student Privacy Law That Still Matters in 2025, All About NJ A4978: The Student Data Privacy Law You Shouldn't Ignore, and What to Know About the Texas Student Privacy Act (Ed Code §32.151).
SOPIPA modernized student privacy by addressing how online K-12 services handle data. It prohibits targeted ads, commercial profiling, and selling student information, and it requires reasonable security and deletion upon request. AB 2799 extended these protections to preschool and prekindergarten.
Read the details: The official SB 1177 bill text.
SOPIPA ensures student data fuels learning, not marketing.
For school teams:
SOPIPA moved districts toward privacy-by-design.
SOPIPA and FERPA work together. FERPA governs schools' handling of education records; SOPIPA governs third-party K-12 operators, banning targeted ads, selling data, and non-educational profiling while requiring reasonable security and deletion on request. The result is a stronger, layered privacy approach that reflects how modern classrooms use technology.
Oliver Page
Some more Insigths
Back
